"Чему учит история прагматизма? Какую роль могли бы сыграть прагматисты в диалоге-противостоянии аналитической и континентальной философских традиций? Какое понятие является ключевым для современного прагматизма: "опыт", "социальная практика" или "язык"? На вопросы международного интервью, организованного сектором современной западной философии Института философии РАН, отвечают ведущие философы-прагматисты и исследователи прагматизма из США, Канады, Австралии, Германии, Франции, Швейцарии, Финляндии, Австрии, Испании, Италии, Польши, Китая, Японии, Сингапура, Бразилии и России.What does the history of American pragmatism teach us? Which term, "experience", "language" or "social practice", best expresses the central motivation of late pragmatism? What positive role, if any, could pragmatists play in "settling" current analytical-continental controversy? Leading contemporary pragmatists and scholars of pragmatism from the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Switzerland, Finland, Austria, Spain, Italy, Poland, China, Japan, Singapore, Brazil and Russia give answers to these questions in a series of interviews organized by the Department of Contemporary Western Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences."
"CHemu uchit istoriya pragmatizma? Kakuyu rol mogli by sygrat pragmatisty v dialoge-protivostoyanii analiticheskoy i kontinentalnoy filosofskikh traditsiy? Kakoe ponyatie yavlyaetsya klyuchevym dlya sovremennogo pragmatizma: "opyt", "sotsialnaya praktika" ili "yazyk"? Na voprosy mezhdunarodnogo intervyu, organizovannogo sektorom sovremennoy zapadnoy filosofii Instituta filosofii RAN, otvechayut vedushchie filosofy-pragmatisty i issledovateli pragmatizma iz SSHA, Kanady, Avstralii, Germanii, Frantsii, SHveytsarii, Finlyandii, Avstrii, Ispanii, Italii, Polshi, Kitaya, YAponii, Singapura, Brazilii i Rossii.What does the history of American pragmatism teach us? Which term, "experience", "language" or "social practice", best expresses the central motivation of late pragmatism? What positive role, if any, could pragmatists play in "settling" current analytical-continental controversy? Leading contemporary pragmatists and scholars of pragmatism from the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Switzerland, Finland, Austria, Spain, Italy, Poland, China, Japan, Singapore, Brazil and Russia give answers to these questions in a series of interviews organized by the Department of Contemporary Western Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences."
